@untimelygamer @chaosprime I'm going to start sending you things to say. If you don't say them, you're censoring me.
-
-
Replying to @XaiaX
@XaiaX@untimelygamer if we modify that slightly such that i say some of them and not others, i'm pretty sure it's actually true2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@XaiaX@untimelygamer i mean, if the dominant usage of "censor" for the past century, as in television network censor, is in any way valid1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@untimelygamer I think it's only censorship if there's a tiny or singular control point near the production level.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@chaosprime@untimelygamer thus not selling a game is not censorship, but preventing the production of it is, regardless of .gov affiliation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@chaosprime@untimelygamer thus, AU's lack of an 18 rating was censorship, Target choosing not to sell it is whatever. Other stores can/are.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@XaiaX@untimelygamer it's not censorship if it doesn't result in suppression, only change of venue? could be, but seems exploitable1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@untimelygamer yes, very. There's also a fuzzy area between "no one is selling this" and "no one is buying this".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@chaosprime@untimelygamer which leads to the question "is a boycott censorship?" It's very similar in result, but not method.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@XaiaX @untimelygamer yeah... prior vs. post restraint, open vs. secret, accountability all seem relevant
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.