Huh. Maybe I should reconsider Scala. Googling for Haskell jobs mentions it a lot.
-
-
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38 my checking into Scala revealed that it is absolutely infested with Haskellosity, which is why i ran the other direction3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime Yeah, but I think Haskell is great and would be all over it if I had some time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38 in that case i have no doubt you will find Scala to be a glorious land of happiness and rainbows4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime But I came to the conclusion that, if you're going to use it as a functional language, god save your soul.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38 yeah, apparently you can't *really* use it without leaning on Java imports half the time, so that's gonna be pretty halfassed4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime Find me a library in scala that doesn't define one.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38 sure, it seemed like the whole point of Scala was to be a DSL construction kit1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime I don't think that was the original intent, but I wasn't there and it is now.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@camlorn38 my belief is that the language is named for it, the idea being that it's "scalable" into specific domains rather than usual usage
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.