@FullPresence @JustineTunney of course. the demons of Chöd are not kind in their methods, only in their purpose.
@FullPresence @JustineTunney i presently find i get less nonsensical results out of treating gender as meaning "mode of relating to sex"
-
-
@FullPresence@JustineTunney and noting that your personal mode of relating to your sex & society's are distinct and in a power relationship -
@chaosprime@JustineTunney Fair enough, but let's not base it on genitalia. -
@FullPresence@JustineTunney "sex" doesn't mean "genitalia", but it does mean something (though not a binary something, contra dextrum) -
@FullPresence@JustineTunney and if you'd propose something else for the ground of gender, i'd be fascinated to learn what it might be -
@chaosprime@JustineTunney Mine is neural configuration, contingently shaped internal genetics and external memetics. -
@FullPresence@JustineTunney i would contend that to extent those things are unrelated to sex, they are self-image & social role, not gender -
@chaosprime@JustineTunney what else could gender be at that level? -
@FullPresence@JustineTunney i'm saying gender comprises the part of those things related to sex, not the entirety of those things. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.