So yeah. It would be super cool, dear reader, if you would try to be good, not evil. Thanks for listening to my TED talk. (12/12)
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime For the record, that's not a joke. You've listed my definition, too. Humans are just AIs with the human utility function, anyway1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38 Didn't think it was. It does seem like we'll need a model like this if we don't want our AIs to be either murderous or slaves.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime AI research is the only purely computer science field I think should be regulated, somehow. Scary stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38@chaosprime I don't think so, at least not by legislation. Just bring up the Chaos's tweet stream at the next seminar.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FullPresence
@FullPresence@chaosprime Depends if you subscribe to the can-happen-accidentally theory. I do.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38@chaosprime I think it can too. But the ultimate question: who is the biggest funder of sci-tech now?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FullPresence
@FullPresence@chaosprime At least the funded people give more than a second's thought to safety. We hope. Hobbyists don't necessarily.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @camlorn38
@camlorn38@chaosprime Hobbyists aren't the problem. The problem is capitalism and the state.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FullPresence
@FullPresence@chaosprime I think, when we develop AI, it's going to be accidental. "Aren't neural nets cool, i'll run one on my laptop"...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@camlorn38 @FullPresence I don't really think so. (Allowing the use of AI here to mean self-developing sapient code, not body of work.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.