@jennatar @stillgray Admitting to your bias after the fact isn't enough. Can you show us any proof of what you say about it being nixed?
@FDZ095323 it's just hilarious how having glowing coverage bought and paid for with cash on the barrelhead somehow didn't bother anybody
-
-
@FDZ095323 but when coverage might be influenced by *gasp* actual humans relating to each other, suddenly it's all BUT MUH ETHICS -
@FDZ095323 it just makes it really clear that this isn't about ethics, it's about pushing back against Those People - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@chaosprime It did bother people. You not pay attention to what people are bothered by changes nothing. -
@FDZ095323 but somehow they just sort of lived with it. but a woman dev is *gasp* unchaste and it's all RELEASE THE HOUNDS. so asinine. - 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@chaosprime@FDZ095323 no, see, corporations exerting influence on writing is a FEATURE of capitalism, human relationships doing so is a BUGThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.