@chaosprime that's not what i've seen. i've seen expressions of disappointment that he is refusing to listen/learn after MANY polite convos.
-
-
Replying to @wirehead2501
@wirehead2501 respectfully, that's not at all what a search on@gittip last night showed5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime for him to then turn around a publish a piece basically inviting more abuse/harassment of Shanley is totally unacceptable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @duckinator
@duckinator@wirehead2501 *nod* that's the part that bothers me. she can dish criticism all she likes but if she receives it that's abusive.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@duckinator "if you were just nicer about it, we'd listen to you and take you seriously" is fantasy that perpetuates status quo.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wirehead2501
@wirehead2501@duckinator sure. hell, Shanley's anger is most of why i like her. i didn't read that piece as significantly tone policing. hm1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@wirehead2501 the post says she said nothing new, but yet she's the one who got listened to AND the one who got that response.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @duckinator
@chaosprime@wirehead2501 I don't see how that can be read as anything except tone policing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @duckinator
@duckinator been trying to parse that and not sure it's working. the assertion is that she got listened to, not others, b/c angrier tone?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@duckinator b/c that seems like the opposite of "traditional" tone policing, that says you won't get listened to if you're too angry
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.