re: https://twitter.com/metasynthie/status/460460872914055168 … is it really reductionist to say a game *can be viewed as* a system? one can still acknowledge other views.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @chrisamaphone
@chrisamaphone no, it isn't, and the knee-jerk hostility to theory camp is not my favorite part of the indie gaming hypestorm1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime the puzzling thing is that i just read naomi's (& anna's) book on game design and loved it- but saw it as an account of systems!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisamaphone
@chaosprime to me it was a *much more systems-based* account of game design than i'd seen previously1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisamaphone
@chrisamaphone that's pretty fascinating. did it use the word system or did it discuss things in systems terms without the word?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime hmm, can't recall. guess that means it didn't use it prominently.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisamaphone
@chrisamaphone that fits with a picture i'm getting of "system" and "interactivity" being constructed as shibboleths of "the formalists"1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@chrisamaphone we can analyze and understand things as systems, but to use the word is to mark oneself as part of Formalism (Delenda Est)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.