I want to get this straight, tho: Is the idea that tweets shld be considered private if the person who composed them is not a public figure?
-
-
Replying to @AnnaHolmes
.
@AnnaHolmes Twitter is a public forum, period. And because of that, it can and will be reported on by journalists.1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @starfishncoffee
.
@starfishncoffee@AnnaHolmes People have private conversations in public places all the time. The ethical issues for journos aren't simple.5 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @studentactivism
@starfishncoffee@AnnaHolmes try mixing a little consequentialist ethics w/your deontological ethics, it's super effective@studentactivism2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@AnnaHolmes@studentactivism Wow I DO speak academia and I have no idea what that said.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @starfishncoffee
@starfishncoffee@AnnaHolmes@studentactivism consequentialist ethics assign value to actions based on their consequences.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@starfishncoffee@AnnaHolmes@studentactivism deontological ethics focus on the act in itself, which is what you seem to be focusing on.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@starfishncoffee@AnnaHolmes@studentactivism teleological ethics focus on the intent of actions, and mostly consist of pathetic excuses.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@starfishncoffee @AnnaHolmes @studentactivism what i'm saying is that it may be of benefit to consider consequences, not just act-in-itself.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.