@johnwlockwoodiv It seems like centering the victim's evaluation of these issues would be a positive step.
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime
@johnwlockwoodiv And maybe asking whether they wanted to have a "side" in the first place or we're all just deciding what they should want.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime u just have to ask how would i feel if it was being done to me1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @johnwlockwoodiv
@johnwlockwoodiv Truly? When affective forecasting is a cognitive task that humans are almost legendarily bad at?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime on a whole, we've been pretty freaking good at it. baby learns pretty quickly finger on hot stove is bad idea1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @johnwlockwoodiv
@johnwlockwoodiv That's conditioning, not affective forecasting. Read about it. We are awful at knowing how *we* will feel in a situation.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@johnwlockwoodiv Much less a different human being whose life and interior state we are in no way privy to the fine details of.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime how about we just give the benefit of the doubt to the victim instead of attacker?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @johnwlockwoodiv
@johnwlockwoodiv Sure. Don't see how that requires drawing battle lines past which go vilification rather than a demand for better behavior.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime holding others to high standards pushes them to be better1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@johnwlockwoodiv Then we are entirely in agreement.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.