If you're into the kind of SJ that's about having Bad Guys to use as punching bags, not improving human behavior, we prolly can't be frans.
@wirehead2501 Parse clarification rq: one of the people is safe, one of the people is safe to be around, one of the sides is safe to be on?
-
-
@chaosprime one of the communities (the one that does not enable abusers) is safe..r. ppl who apologize for abusers are less safe/trusted. -
@wirehead2501 *nodnod* Yeah, clearly. If the response is to try to silence the victim and defend the abuser, that's a serious hellhole. -
@wirehead2501 I'm pretty sure there's a huge gap between requiring that the abuse stop and constructing the abuser as The Enemy, though. -
@chaosprime i don't see construction as The Enemy - feel like that's a strawman. Julie just tweeted smth abt that. -
@wirehead2501 Failing to see how a forced choice of one "side" vs. another isn't about the people on the other "side" being The Enemy. -
@chaosprime i think you are choosing an overly politically-loaded reading of that term. you don't have to be my enemy to not be my ally. -
@wirehead2501 Hmm. It really read to me like "if someone is abused, you either join in vilifying the abuser or you're off the team". -
@wirehead2501 Ashe blocking me in response to me questioning her about it did very little to dispel that impression. - 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@chaosprime er, safe to be around.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.