So why should that mean that people like me don't get to exist in fiction? Why is a happy bisexual more "edgy" than a fucking unicorn?
-
-
Replying to @seananmcguire
@seananmcguire because the unicorn doesn't challenge anything1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@seananmcguire Not so. Unicorns were highly sexualized symbols before they left Medieval texts and sauntered into kids' books.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShanBarnsley
@ShanBarnsley@seananmcguire i realize that and find it very interesting, but the mass market does not react to what symbols *used* to mean2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@seananmcguire Little Red Riding Hood's crimson cape disagrees.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShanBarnsley
@ShanBarnsley@seananmcguire we can talk all day about how symbols *should* be regarded as edgy if we were reading them closely; so what?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@ShanBarnsley@seananmcguire the question is why X is seen as edgy and Y isn't, & the answer is that Y fits in a culturally constructed box1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@ShanBarnsley@seananmcguire or, more precisely, is understood to fit in that box even if it doesn't remotely do so on a close reading4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@ShanBarnsley@seananmcguire in some ways that's good because it can facilitate slipping all kinds of things past the censors1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
@ShanBarnsley like i bet@seananmcguire could write a book about a happy bi *unicorn* that would be regarded as "just about unicorns"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ShanBarnsley @seananmcguire Lewis used it to get me to read Christian spiritual warfare propaganda because talking animals
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.