@chaosprime @wirehead2501 ideology is irrelevant to the fact that you are actively harming these sites. Intent doesn’t matter.
-
-
Replying to @XaiaX
@XaiaX@wirehead2501 What is the harm that a site has incurred when I view it adblocked vs. when I don't view it at all?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@wirehead2501 X views *$y ad revenue, where X is “actual views minus ad blocked views”. That revenue pays writers & staff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@XaiaX@wirehead2501 Yeah, that's not a responsive answer. They don't get the ad revenue when I don't visit the site, either.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@wirehead2501 and you don’t exploit their labor that way, either. Your actions are harmful and your reasons don’t matter.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@XaiaX@wirehead2501 I'd also like to know why the harm to users -- crashed browsers, malware infestations, hostile UX -- doesn't signify.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@wirehead2501 but saying “I will exploit your labor but actively take steps to make sure you’re not paid” is not the high ground2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @XaiaX
@XaiaX@wirehead2501 The labor product was made freely available. If payment were a condition of use, there would be a paywall.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime@XaiaX@wirehead2501 Is your argument that the creator is only allowed to have conditions that are technically enforceable?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@flooey Whereas technical unenforceability combined with disrespect, hostility and outright harm is a losing strategy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.