evaluate: "it is more virtuous to build a sandcastle well than to conquer the world poorly"
-
-
query: are the sandcastles done in the brutalist style
-
optional
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Today I learned your audience is disappointing.
-
who knew they were so racist toward conquest
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The gif search for 'virtue' or 'virtuous' is a wild ride.pic.twitter.com/vQgEbnV4rU
-
weird how it's temporally impossible for Kant to have been staring bug-eyed at this on the living room floor at the age of 3
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The comparison is impossible because Descartes was right. These entities don't have mathematical magnitudes. Closest approximation: the units are wrong.
-
"Is four Coulombs a longer duration than ten kilograms?" Err, neither of those things are a duration, so...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Conquering is inherently unaesthetic because it destroys edges and smooths topology. Better to pursue an aesthetic goal with varying degrees of success than an unaesthetic one well or poorly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Conquering is almost always bad (and whether you do a good job at it is only slightly relevant), while building a sandcastle is almost always neutral?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.