i don't honestly feel i need to undermine anything until i encounter a version of the concept that doesn't collapse under its own weight
-
-
you said this last time ("i've already gone deep already" etc). i'm not telling you take philosophy 101, i said your concern was philosophy 101 tier & has already been talked about & debated endlessly & directly. you said the exact opposite was the case--when it is not the case.
-
i don't mean that no one has offered definitions, i mean that when i ask *you*, who want me to believe that there are compelling defenses of the concept, to show me some literature, i get something that refuses to define its terms
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sch-sch-sch-sch, sch-sch-schelling point. Guh-guh-guh-gravity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Forgive the digression, but ''God take Philosophy 101' a Ted Talk trying to convince a divinity to either audit the course or remove it from existence' needs to happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.