I can't begin to imagine how drunk I would have to be to do this.
-
-
Replying to @Klockwerklime @danielcrenna and
is it possible to have an LD number over 100
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @Klockwerklime and
Chaos Retweeted
also pretty sure this was supposed to be a reply to you Twitter has made it freakishly difficult to reply where you actually want in some interfaces https://twitter.com/XmasTreeTara/status/1256363530430840835 …
Chaos added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @Klockwerklime and
Everyone stop talking, I’m trying to figure out if a lethal dose is lethal for more than 100 percent of a population sample.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danielcrenna @chaosprime and
LD number greater than 100. LD100.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danielcrenna @chaosprime and
yeah, but it makes no sense. But maybe that's good
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @no__elle_ @danielcrenna and
i mean, do we *know* that you can't poison someone so hard that people die who weren't part of the sample
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @danielcrenna and
Hang on, we can detect the radiation in the people that Russia poisons with polonium, right? Thus it only stands to reason that you could leave someone so irradiated that their body could sicken or even kill nearby people.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
broke: LD50 bespoke: LD9000
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.