Hmm. Maybe a different tack: afaict the relationship of (eternal)ism to meaning is only obstructive to the extent that it's expected to provide meaning (including by accounting for its absence). I don't think that expectation itself comes from the content of the top-down process
-
-
That "because" seems questionable! Ime the native capacity is to be nurtured, yes, and applied to the experience of symbols itself, for freedom from the tyranny of (what) the symbol (represents). I only see novelty in the way one approaches symbolic experience
-
one may certainly question it
it's what some things i see happening look like to me, i ain't married to it
your approach sounds good to me - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
ime there's a dangerous sense of causality which often flows from a) i've adopted this belief (eg, in inner peace) to b) i am experiencing inner peace to c) the belief in inner peace is necessary to, or at least associated with, the experience of inner peace. Cost me 10 yrs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.