In other words, it's what I came up with as a personal exercise of this: https://twitter.com/neuropoetic/status/1251974237780422657?s=20 … But effectively the seas are about that which isn't clearly structured. The flux that is so fine in structure it's basically fluid. That which immerses and fuels structural change.
-
-
Replying to @neuropoetic @metadiogenes and
Also, I just found out about this quote from William James, perhaps the first great NeuroPoetic in the west!pic.twitter.com/N3DnSTHNuZ
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @neuropoetic @metadiogenes and
So uh, to recollect my thoughts: Seas and Trees are the complementary metaphors for the fluid-like dynamics and the structural regularities, respectively. Some analogical details are that trees are nurtured by fluids in multiple ways, and the role of trees in shaping ecologies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @neuropoetic @metadiogenes and
In natural ecosystems, animals' niches might not directly overlap in the main characteristics. But nevertheless they share the same ecosystem. Wherever there is commonality to adapt to, there will be attunement, in general to a holistic (ecosystemic) benefit, that can loop back.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @neuropoetic @metadiogenes and
Neuropoetic Retweeted Artem Kaznatcheev
Oh I was wondering,
@kaznatcheev is that cool sounding paper out yet? :Dhttps://twitter.com/kaznatcheev/status/1248291660531974144 …Neuropoetic added,
Artem Kaznatcheev @kaznatcheevEvolutionary biologists, computer scientists & mathematicians of twitter, which title is better: [1] "Ecology can speed up long-term evolution" [2] "Evolution is exponentially more efficient with ecology" /cc@akcayerol@jplotkin@joshuagrochow@paulwgoldberg@stevenstrogatzShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuropoetic @metadiogenes and
A draft of it has been circulating & I'm hoping to post a preprint this week. Unfortunately, I ended up going for neither of the titles in poll -- deciding on "Evolution is exponentially more powerful with frequency-dependent selection", instead. I will ping you once it's out!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kaznatcheev @metadiogenes and
Super exciting! I look forward to it! If you can indulge me in my impatient curiosity, would you mind sharing how much that thesis generalises beyond natural ecologies and evolution? I suspect - wishfully perhaps - that it generalizes for ontogenic development for e.g. brains?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuropoetic @kaznatcheev and
Or in other words: What are the particular conditions for that effect? Could we say evolution is about (multiscale) processes development of species via selections of particular variants in set of variants distributed in strata of time windows, generated over time by the species?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuropoetic @kaznatcheev and
In turn, ecologies are then the contextual dynamics (and systems), such that it acts upon the processes of variation and selection (by applying pressure in either or both directions on relevant parameters), present in these ecosystems. Perhaps mutualistic processes are key here?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuropoetic @kaznatcheev and
I'm really interested in what is meant with frequency-dependent selection though. Regardless if you would be able to answer these questions, looking forward to the preprint and thanks for the reply ^^
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
network effects and their inverse in phenotypes and genotypes, basically traits that generate more fitness the more common they are in the population, or less fitness the more common they are
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.