i enjoy how Brad Warner occasionally just busts into declaiming the idea of our all consciousnesses being a single point of awareness threaded endlessly through time and space as just plain-talkin' fact
-
-
not sure about that, at least, it seems interesting enough to try to reformulate it into something testable and falsifiable. For one, it would be interesting to explicate "point of awareness" ^______^
-
it's just going to annoy you basically, given that we have an experiential point of view, a consciousness, and that that consciousness is manifestly and demonstrably being fed a heavily falsified experience, including the experience of making choices, we can make some guesses
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
meditate more. it's possible to perceive this truth through direct phenomenological experience. it's also a very good idea.
-
i meditated plenty, thanks, i just don't flatter myself that the direct phenomenological experience isn't something i'm perfectly capable of falsifying for myself
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
who needs evidence when you have p u r e g n o s i s
-
damn right. if pure gnosis was good enough for my pappy, who was me, and my grandpappy, who was also me, then it's good enough for me
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.