unfortunately, the opportunity to become more resilient is never something you consent to.
which point? because that sounds like an opposite assertion to "unfortunately, the opportunity to become more resilient is never something you consent to."
-
-
if something was getting lost there (was this material from you that
@sadmoonanalog was quoting?) and the whole point was just that desire doesn't accomplish anything without action arising from it, i mean sure -
the 'consent' line seems to go considerably beyond that into an assertion that resilience building is only something you can prepare to do when a situation not of your choosing arises that allows you to carry it out, is all
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the point I was making in thread.. in a way it is an opposite assertion? in that resilience won't automatically build on its own simply by exposure, it requires intentional planning and controlled (consensual) test situations for said plans.
-
k it is opposite in that if resilience building opportunities are not something you can consent to, then the whole consent-and-planning based structure both you and i have described is impossible, which makes it confusing that you seem to be arguing for them both together
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.