"there are a number of things you can do to become resilient, but none of them are going to come of your actively choosing that you *WANT* to become more resilient"
sure. the original assertion is that is itself not sufficient, that things you can do to build resilience aren't things that will happen because of wanting that / that you can choose / that you can consent to. i think i see a point there but i'm questioning how complete it is
-
-
280char kinda stunts completeness.. the point was you have to *want to* plan around the distressing situation and *intentionally* build resilience to it through the plan, or the framework doesn't work, and nothing about your resilience changes.
-
which point? because that sounds like an opposite assertion to "unfortunately, the opportunity to become more resilient is never something you consent to."
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
the idea seems to be that resilience is built in adversity and you'll always choose to avoid adversity to the extent that you can. which i don't think is necessarily the case
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.