In general, the primary criteria you use to determine if it's okay or not to kill a living thing is how much _____ it has
-
-
“no idea” really?
-
none lrn2qualia noob
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Measuring the specific capacity of suffering wasn’t part of the question
-
*binary* capacity for suffering is the implied criterion? baaahahahaha
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I maintain that authoritarians of are pzombos and faking it, so setting them on fire is only bad because it contributes to CO2 accumulation and by extension ocean acidification which is bad
-
you're so hot when you deploy rational arguments against genocide
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's not true that we have "no idea". We can recognise suffering in many animals just as easily as we can recognise suffering in other humans.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
As an empath, I don't feel wheat has that much capacity for suffering. Indeed less than gingers.
-
wow, that's pretty dehumanizing to wheat
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.