it's fine though because everybody's trying to clear away all opposition so they can have their way, but if they succeed too well they collapse, so we'll evolve ways to be worse and worse at winning much evidence this has been going superbly for a whilehttps://twitter.com/rainherself/status/1194671308501594113 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @chaosprime
I always thought of this as the reason systems that relied on competition were ultimately futile -- someone eventually wins, and then they stop working. If that's really the only thing that works then we might as well just burn everything.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @terrycloth11 @chaosprime
It's the inevitable march of entropy that denies your conclusion; someone may win, but their victory will never last, and then the game is wide open once again
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Octapode @chaosprime
Not a big fan of plans that deliberately incorporate a thousand years of darkness.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
the thousand years of darkness is still a failure mode. if you don't like it, exert yourself to keep some jackass egregore from winning
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.