it is an interesting ethical question as to, when we as a society enact policies that provide crucial general benefits but impose catastrophic costs on some people at random, whether we will take collective responsibility for those costs or say "lol get fucked losers"
it's just pathetic to me, all the smugness based on a pattern of induction that's so long-established as spectacularly wrong that Paracelsus not only would have been disgusted by it but was, specificallyhttps://twitter.com/chaosprime/status/1192967149473669120 …
-
-
I dunno man, USistanis are not dying in droves (and just for the record "autism epidemic" claims are likely outright fake) so it would seem so far they're lucking out on "unpredictable effects of co-admknestering complex immunological compounds)
-
it's not good practice though and FDA should explicitly forbid it unless particular coadministratoon protocol is explicitly found safe under same standards that would apply to deploying a novel drug
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.