it is an interesting ethical question as to, when we as a society enact policies that provide crucial general benefits but impose catastrophic costs on some people at random, whether we will take collective responsibility for those costs or say "lol get fucked losers"
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @chaosprime
At first I assumed “catoatrophic costs” was about some heavily endangered group such as disabled people. Because it would be quite absurd to call a cost to a billionaire that “catastrophic.” I am always a day late and a dollar short with Chaos jokes.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.