it is an interesting ethical question as to, when we as a society enact policies that provide crucial general benefits but impose catastrophic costs on some people at random, whether we will take collective responsibility for those costs or say "lol get fucked losers"
-
-
I think there's a problem in the shape of people making evidence free claims of catastrophic costs having been imposed on them and/or Karen from HR (she's from Canadian office you don't know her), for reasons ranging from politics to brain glitches
-
that definitely seems like a shape of problem that would necessarily exist! which is handy if one were to want to pretend that it's the only shape of problem that exists
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's really a question if the society is willing to bear the long-term cost of sacrificing its members at random, as they might be very valuable members.
-
good thing the dominant societies on our planet have such a strong tradition of burning geniuses like cordwood
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.