it is an interesting ethical question as to, when we as a society enact policies that provide crucial general benefits but impose catastrophic costs on some people at random, whether we will take collective responsibility for those costs or say "lol get fucked losers"
-
-
that would probably take building up an enormous edifice of shaming around even considering the possibility of such costs but that's hardly an excuse not to bust out a li'l elbow grease. 's just words, people will produce an endless stream of those just to hear themselves talk
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.