-
-
Replying to @chaosprime
adding to that, members have to coordinate to protect said affordance and you pretty much have an egregore on your hand and then some of those affordances impose negative externalities on others
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @lunavis @chaosprime
to put it uncharitably, it seems kind of like contracting tapeworms for weight loss purposes
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @lunavis
you certainly do have an egregore on your hands. this is why we egregore your analogy has more going for it than any of us would like i'm sure known implementations certainly have room for improvement
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
✨ Lunavis ✨ Retweeted ✨ Lunavis ✨
it also points to a tension between freedom of information and freedom of conscience https://twitter.com/lunavis/status/790543849714221056 … also prescient
✨ Lunavis ✨ added,
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @lunavis
Chaos Retweeted GigglePutsch
another fine example that's related but less related than it lookshttps://twitter.com/GigglePutsch/status/1188526464800579584 …
Chaos added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @lunavis
somewhat undermined by insufficient occultism i.e. thinking the concept started in 2012 rather than some particular formulation, apparently because of not realizing it's another spelling of gris-gris which dates to the 17th century at the very latest
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @lunavis
this strikes me as yet another "make people die for cow moonity by lying to them" operation tbh
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
this framing isn't exactly wrong but seems to not recognize any value to the individual in their village not being overrun by raiders
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @lunavis
if "the village" needs to resort to weaponized bullshit to try and trick its inhabitants into defending it, chances are it's a shitty village, which is actually almost universally the case
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
is its survival not preferable if it's shitty
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @lunavis
well, chances are if it was "confidently preferable" it would not need shitfuckery. Need for shitfuckery, to me, indicates that the raiders are not THAT bad and the village is not THAT good and it's basically like choosing between CIA and ze rooskiyes
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.