unfortunate thing about crucial social affordances whose cost-benefit structures can't be articulated because articulating them would wreck their benefits is that when someone wants to tear them down because they've decided it's what's making them sad, you don't have a lot to say
-
-
I kind of think the optimal path forward would be a radical schism. The problem as it stands is that the planet is too small and too logistically integrated to support that.
-
Seems like the each cohort would try to destroy the other, one for efficiency reasons and one for fun.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.