unfortunate thing about crucial social affordances whose cost-benefit structures can't be articulated because articulating them would wreck their benefits is that when someone wants to tear them down because they've decided it's what's making them sad, you don't have a lot to say
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @chaosprime
Alternate opinion: social affordances that get their benefits wrecked if articulated are either shitfuckery or an operation to fuck back the shitfuckers, and are thus an indicator of grossly suboptimal design.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @deus_ex_homine @0K_ultra
she certainly is, isn't it delightful
12:50 PM - 27 Oct 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.