i'm only just beginning to understand the word "qualia" but it seems to me that this subjective point of view is covered by "self-modifying cognition"? i assumed "consciousness" specifically referred to "self-aware cognition" (idk if there's a difference)
-
-
*really, covered by any form of "cognition"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @goblinodds @oimoiles
it does not seem so to me nothing about cognition explains the existence of experiential perspectives
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @oimoiles
like, why one mind would experience the same input differently from another?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
like, why would someone use words like 'mind' and 'experience' like those terms mean anything we can rigorously define
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
idgaf about rigor (COULD YOU TELL), accuracy would be fine
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
uh, the requirements for accuracy are surely a superset of the requirements for rigor
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
they are not, and don't call me Shirley
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
big dubiety on that one chief
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
always praiseworthy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
for a nice example, though, take the scenario used to talk about "justified true belief" where the guy believes there's a rock in the other guy's pocket but for the wrong reasons or whatever his belief isn't justified and clearly is not rigorous but it's accurate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.