the way we talk about "pattern recognition" constructs it as a passive activity: we react to the pattern by noticing it when we see it this is catastrophically wrong the fundamental act is pattern *generation*, inductive construction of novel patterns to apply to the world
-
-
we also say key recognition right thou
-
i mean we kind of don't but it wouldn't be nonsensical for us to but the way we use the term pattern recognition is analogous to using "key recognition" to mean locksmithing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.