what if some people who objected to the terribly unwoke hierarchicality of the "primary/secondary" relationship model in polyamory did so because if people thought of themselves as secondary partners that would tend to limit the unreciprocated demands that could be placed on them
-
Show this thread
-
The Tyranny of Structurelessness, but for guru harems
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
remember, kids, the difference between polycule and polycult is T (yes, yes, gratuitously misandric. misandry is only bad when it's not funny)
6 replies 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chaosprime
Political graph for polycules where u either will get ancomm subby unionization, competition for who will be the primary bottom bitch, or all power just remains within the autocratic top
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @atranquilnight @chaosprime
I haven’t really thought about a polycule in which I might be able to compete to be primary bottom bitch, and now it’s, um, well TMI but provoking disturbing fantasies
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I think the last of the 3 options you name is the cult thing
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But now that I’m giving the idea more consideration, Christianity seems to be the historical outcome of a small cult led by a locally-well-established primary bottom bitch (Jesus Christ) getting taken over by a long series of tops, beginning with St Paul.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
don't forget Jesus Christ's ouster of the previous locally-well-established primary bottom bitch John the Baptist
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.