Can anybody give me a breakdown of this "phenomenal binding" argument? Still seems oblique to me.
-
-
-
if you're responding to a tweet about p-zombies regarding it, i guess you mean the one where people try to explain how sense impressions become experential phenomena? idk, looks like a bunch of handwaving laughably inadequate to explain anything about it to me
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I still think the idea of p zombies is ridiculous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m an np-complete zombie.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there's a killing to be made on the secondary market selling p-ness enhancement to grad students who desperately need to find significance because their supervisors will KILL them if they don't get a publication this year
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Boooooo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If P(Gorka Strength) &~Q(Shapiro Brain) is conceivable, then P&~Q is 1-possible and by a posteriori necessity Bro-sellian monism is true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
