ha ha just kidding you'll effortlessly retroactively justify it to yourselves because regardless of whether it was a useful question to ask it wasn't a question somebody right-thinking would ask
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well the study already found that but there's no plausible pathway between that and the disease
-
study didn't find any "becauses", as well it shouldn't have, except oops that leaves every potentially motivating inferential path among the correlated factors open to interpretation, especially the ones like "does pain make chicks hot" that provide cheap rage clickbait
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or any other lifestyle factors that co-occur with measured attractiveness, rather than a direct causal link between endometriosis and attractiveness. Say, workout routines, types of diet, high heels (not likely, but go with it), makeup, etc.
-
“Beauty” in this context might be code for “skinny” lol
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think the "attractive people get diagnosed more reliably because doctors take them more seriously" is a better hypothesis.
-
poor explanatory power for the specificity to one type of endometriosis
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why would we feel like the real assholes?
-
if lambasting a study as vile and misogynist that produced useful insight and potentially improved outcomes for women's health wouldn't make anyone feel like an asshole, okay, party on then
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
one would think learning more about ourselves is a good thing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.