you know who likes discourse that proceeds only according to logos, not pathos and ethos? people who are bad at pathos and ethos
-
-
Show this thread
-
-
this is a great idea, actually the Three Discourseers, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos and for some reason all the attention goes to their buddy d'Artagnanhttps://twitter.com/KumyssFletcher/status/1161479182347583488 …
Show this thread -
so much deft use of pathos to argue against this tweet in its replies, very impressivehttps://twitter.com/chaosprime/status/1161391478792511488 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i prefer the classic 'im not making an argument, im insulting you'
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I eagerly await Quillette's publishing "Why Ad Hominems Are Good, Actually" by Hetero Sapiens
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think a lot of formal fallacies have rhetorical power because they are actually heuristically useful. Insulting an opponent is very efficient way of signalling that they are not a reliable interlocutor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only true scots would make that argument!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what does a phrenulum have to do with gotchas?
#phreneticThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.