its alternative solution of "you can have freedom as long as essentially everybody agrees what that consists of and demands it at the same time" is a delight. the US would also be guaranteed freedom by a legion of magical ponies with freedom powers, so let's wish for that too
-
-
am i though? someone who's read the article presumably read "Freedom in a society happens when, and only when, that entire society demands freedom. When the entire society earnestly demands freedom, even the most murderous tyrannies are rendered powerless."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @ThomCR and
sure, tho, true story. does it even need explaining that "this one high-cohesion society could do this thing in a fashion i'm going to call without guns even though the entire society has military training, therefore no societies need guns" is a miserable excuse for an argument?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
do you have some kind of thing where any kind of restatement using words other than the exact ones in the source is a "misinterpretation"?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
right, except this is LITERALLY WHAT HE'S SAYING, his EXACT WORDS claim that you can only have freedom by mass action as a high-cohesion society, and that because this was possible this means nobody needs population armament
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
please provide one (1) example of a low cohesion society heroically defeating tyranny without population armament in a manner that in any way resembles the fashion described for South Korea
-
-
lol pathetic
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.