another service our antinatalist friends perform! normative rationalism proceeds by palming a card, reasoning to a point where an emotive judgment is elided because it's assumed to be universal; antinatalists show no such response is in fact universalhttps://twitter.com/chaosprime/status/1150605408454815745 …
"bottleneck" is a good word for it, though idk if you mean the same one i do. if the only time you get to inject your intuition/emotions/aesthetics is in picking axioms or desired outcomes, it'd be irrational not to expect there to be immense pressure to choose the ~right~ ones
-
-
traditionally of course this has been addressed by doing rationality poorly and injecting intuition, emotions, and aesthetics all along the way in the form of bias and motivated reasoning, but i imagine we'd like to not enshrine that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t see how restricting the moral scope of intuitions, thus reducing their power, would lead to people caring *more* about which intuitions are used.
-
it's a relative of the bikeshed effect. if you've got them in a box instead of woven deeply into a process, it's easy to point at them and pick them over
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.