religious tenet that the religion's tenets are a generic prescription and anyone may freely violate them if they fully believe what they're doing is better; you will still be punished if caught because getting caught demonstrates your lack of full belief in what you were doing
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @chaosprime
Hmm, but the religion's tenet are meant to provide the framework for making those moral decisions. Can't override your primary directive, etc. Getting caught is the discovery that you have rogue tenets
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @reflected_sky
we're accustomed to religions that only have restrictive tenets, but expansive tenets are also possible; a tenet calling to diligently increase your understanding of the world would inherently prescribe development beyond the religion's tenets, not just within them
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
A religion that aspired to be a sort of seed or meta morality would be rad, but (and I no expert on religions) it seems to me that we're accustomed to religions claiming exhaustiveness because that's just how they work in practice
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @reflected_sky
need to verb the word arete so i can construct the second person imperative of it
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
arete is already pretty perfect. "are" would be the singular I guess?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
what do you think, eigen, are you up for giving people the advice "are"
-
-
yes although a little ambigious? maybe "pursue arete"?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
that'd rock
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.