That's a tautology.
-
-
...no? My previous personhood criteria still apply. If a person meets that standard, but then temporarily ceases to, that doesn't withdraw personhood status. That's all. Nothing self-referential, which is a phrase I rarely find myself saying.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Fetuses meet your criteria for personhood.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They can communicate with recursive grammar, make long-term plans, and have preferences? News to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Can babies?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sam Burnstein Retweeted Sam Burnstein
"babies aren't people yet"https://twitter.com/GrumplessGrinch/status/1151904948743024645 …
Sam Burnstein added,
Sam Burnstein @GrumplessGrinchReplying to @Laneret1 @ankurrsharma @chaosprimeI said pls no Diogenes! But: babies aren't people yet. Comatose people are more tricky and get us into some continuity of identity issues, but generally I would append my definition to note that *expected to be temporary* failures of personhood criteria are not disqualifying.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So babies aren't people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, I'll say that a third time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"Babies aren't people" -
@grumplessgrinch2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
lol it's not like this is the first time I've ever said it. It's probably not even one of my top five controversial opinions.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
the people were astounded at his doctrine
they hated @GrumplessGrinch because he told them the truth
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @GrumplessGrinch and
His doctrine is true, correct, and orthodox. Source: am ordained minister.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @GrumplessGrinch and
apostolic succession? in THIS economy?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.