i strongly support antinatalism because its long-term effect will be to breed susceptibility to antinatalism and the tendencies that underpin it, and to a lesser degree susceptibility to memes in general, out of the species
-
Show this thread
-
in general, any time you want to cull the tendency to care about some phenomenon X out of the gene pool, you should field a convincing argument of "X, therefore you should not have children"
4 replies 10 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
Chaos Retweeted Alpha Minus
just lol @ the idea that trad religiosity represents *greater* susceptibility to memes and "i'm too smart to have children in climate change world" represents *lesser*https://twitter.com/AlphaMinus2/status/1151412720283111425 …
Chaos added,
Alpha Minus @AlphaMinus2Replying to @chaosprimeReligious people have more kids than atheists, Most of the time susceptibility to memes actually makes you more evolutionary "successful". That's why the world runs on mass lies and delusions. This tweet is just a sneer pretending to be something more. fu dude.10 replies 1 retweet 46 likesShow this thread -
Chaos Retweeted lynz
see, isn't it amazing? a few dozen generations of this and it isn't too much to hope for elimination of the concepts of morality, selfishness, evil, and investment risk reasoning entirelyhttps://twitter.com/lynz_h55/status/1151815375165808646 …
Chaos added,
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chaosprime
So what exactly is your case against antinatalism?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
i mean, it's the opposite of arete in every way, but it's inherently self-correcting, therefore it drives toward arete
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.