i strongly support antinatalism because its long-term effect will be to breed susceptibility to antinatalism and the tendencies that underpin it, and to a lesser degree susceptibility to memes in general, out of the species
-
Show this thread
-
in general, any time you want to cull the tendency to care about some phenomenon X out of the gene pool, you should field a convincing argument of "X, therefore you should not have children"
4 replies 10 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
Chaos Retweeted Alpha Minus
just lol @ the idea that trad religiosity represents *greater* susceptibility to memes and "i'm too smart to have children in climate change world" represents *lesser*https://twitter.com/AlphaMinus2/status/1151412720283111425 …
Chaos added,
Alpha Minus @AlphaMinus2Replying to @chaosprimeReligious people have more kids than atheists, Most of the time susceptibility to memes actually makes you more evolutionary "successful". That's why the world runs on mass lies and delusions. This tweet is just a sneer pretending to be something more. fu dude.10 replies 1 retweet 46 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chaosprime
Having children in fucked up climate change world to perpetuate statistically-impossible fucked up legacy to own the averages
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chrysopoetics @chaosprime
(The joke is that pending resources that would make it anything like responsible this is explicitly what I’m doing People try to get opinions about the funky genome being related to me entails and I’m just, what, was I supposed to leave them the run of things. What if no)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.