in general, any time you want to cull the tendency to care about some phenomenon X out of the gene pool, you should field a convincing argument of "X, therefore you should not have children"
-
-
Show this thread
-
just lol @ the idea that trad religiosity represents *greater* susceptibility to memes and "i'm too smart to have children in climate change world" represents *lesser*https://twitter.com/AlphaMinus2/status/1151412720283111425 …
Show this thread -
see, isn't it amazing? a few dozen generations of this and it isn't too much to hope for elimination of the concepts of morality, selfishness, evil, and investment risk reasoning entirelyhttps://twitter.com/lynz_h55/status/1151815375165808646 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
shrinkage of Wernicke's area probably
End of conversation
-
-
-
Oh man I’ve read Benatar etc, took seriously, have legit antinatalist friends, still ended up with at least 3 kids... I’m the failure case
-
your intrinsic power level was just too high
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly why I prefer Ebola over the common cold
-
hormesis level: OVER 9000
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right so the better way to achieve decreases in human population then, if that is your goal, is not to push antinatalism, but rather to support what actually causes demographic decline, like more girls in education and economic growth?
-
if that's what you're going for obviously you should want everybody swimming in resources all the time
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.