How (mathematically) does your status vary with number of mates
-
-
Replying to @DogOfPoasts @jenphalian
it isn't a strict cardinal thing, it's a transitive function of the value of those mates. the more hotties i am knocking down, the more this elevates Jennifer's position as alpha bitch
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @jenphalian
This is definitely driving home for me how neurologically bourgeois I am
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @jenphalian
I was recently gently mocked for admitting that I only know how to enjoy sex in the missionary position
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DogOfPoasts @jenphalian
goodness. well, as long as it was very gentle
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @jenphalian
Yeah I get off on pair bonding. It's one of those things where literally being a stereotype is considered ridiculous
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Projecting a bit: Being a person with an intense desire for personal freedom tends to mean your most compatible partners are with you on that. And traits tend to cluster statistically. Chaos wouldn’t be Chaos if he suddenly wanted the imposition of confining rules. That’s Order.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It’s probably presumptuous of me to interject here but I relate hard to the “I would break up with my partner if they suddenly wanted monogamy” thing and I feel like additional explanation of the internality of that might be helpful?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
oh, not presumptuous at all, this is a freewheeling discourse in which you are perfectly welcome, especially bringing a developed perspective to it as you do
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.