well isn't that the point of the framework, to control that shit? I mean, how can you make sure no one falls in love more than they're supposed to unless they are told how to feel based on their level?
-
-
Replying to @rainherself @StevenBrust and
Can't be controlled, I've come to terms with that. But similarly, I don't need to tailor my actions or feelings for theirs.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @jenphalian @rainherself and
what i'm getting here is that maybe theorycrafting a nonmonogamy framework based on annoyance isn't the best approach and maybe if i were going to define multiphilia i should define it as what we actually do
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @jenphalian and
Wait so like are we dropping the "hostile" part of the mission statement now?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @rainherself @jenphalian and
well maybe it's less directly hostile still hostile in the sense of "we are better and smarter than you"
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @jenphalian and
Thank God, I really can't be part of some sort of non-elitist relationship structure
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @rainherself @jenphalian and
oh, obviously. only people who suck don't like elitism
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @rainherself and
tbh people who so suck but want to make up for it also love it (see: us) (or, wait, was this supposed to be unspoken?)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @erin_nerung @chaosprime and
Um excuse you, I do not suck, it is just that my awareness of my greatness is precarious and predicated on the admiration of others. Totes different
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
wow that is quite a petard you have placed before us Steve
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.