let's assume that rather than considering your entire life a resource allocation to be divided up between your partners it's dividing up as much time and attention as you tell it to
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @jenphalian and
Or maybe it's descriptive rather than prescriptive, then you can keep the hierarchy but also have everyone insecure about constantly fluctuating status in a really overt way
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @jenphalian @chaosprime and
I feel like that way just leads to organically developing feelings, gross
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @rainherself @jenphalian and
Waitwaitwaitwait. How do "feelings" enter into this?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @StevenBrust @jenphalian and
well isn't that the point of the framework, to control that shit? I mean, how can you make sure no one falls in love more than they're supposed to unless they are told how to feel based on their level?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jenphalian @rainherself and
what i'm getting here is that maybe theorycrafting a nonmonogamy framework based on annoyance isn't the best approach and maybe if i were going to define multiphilia i should define it as what we actually do
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
ugh, i mean, if you're setting up a framework maybe it's okay for the basis of the framework to be basic. can always punch it up a little in the later chapters
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.