this is the opposite of optimal behavior for interacting with an enemy populace, where predictability leads to defeat and violence should be surprising and terrifying. one may make inferences from this about whether a violence vendor regards one as a client or an enemy
-
-
Show this thread
-
one might hypothesize that a violence provider which is forced to interact with both clients and enemies with no easy way of telling them apart may tend to resolve the intolerable situation by picking some easy distinguishing characteristic and antagonizing everyone who has it
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is a big reason why people tend to fear anarchism instinctively. "Listen, overall there will be less violence" "Yes, but it will be *random*"
-
There’s no empirical data from which to logically extrapolate that there will be less violence.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This sounds like a way to talk about fight club without breaking the first 2 rules.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.