1) no 2) no 3) no
-
-
Replying to @anti_nihilist @sm0b0t and
is #1 "no" because what Alice is doing doesn't fit the word "control" but is better characterized as some other category of attempted behavior alteration like "influence"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @anti_nihilist @chaosprime and
...there was really only one answer I could possibly give you there. But I agree with it. Verbiage wouldn't matter. If x cares about z, and z chooses to put themselves at risk, z may feel sorry, z may feel sympathy for x, but z's choices are their own.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @sm0b0t @anti_nihilist and
Alice tells Bob that him doing X hurts her feelings so badly that if he continues doing X, she is going to kill herself anything different?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @anti_nihilist and
That’s controlling behavior Of the borderline sort o__o
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sm0b0t @anti_nihilist and
does that mean it's the case that if Alice specifies consequences, it's controlling behavior, and if she does not specify consequences, it isn't?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @sm0b0t and
well, it's a kind of "giveaway marker", kind of like when someone draws a gun at you that usually means they don't like you a lot (in humans)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
