idk, maybe sometimes that's an error and the optimal behavior is to invoke a countervailing sacrality so the infinite values can cancel out and the horse trading can get started. probably @vgr has a good article about this
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If someone takes "you're doing thing X, it hurts people in this way, can you maybe consider not doing that" as an attack in every case (as in, without specific evidence of disingenuity or flaws in the statement's logic) then I feel safe assuming they're trash.
-
It's hard not to see such people as caring more about scoring points in their interactions than not harming people, and I don't really want to spend too much time interacting with people who are constantly imposing an adversarial frame.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
- bUt YoU'rE wRoNg - This and the above highlights that some things aren't actually achievable through negotiation. Some desirable things are only externally possible if parties internally bear the costs, i.e. "for free". This doesn't mean impossible. Just not by negotiation.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.