while i'm doing threads, let's dive into something i've never really talked about: the main way i think psychopathy works. which afaik is completely at odds with the literature, though i avoid the literature as a train wreck mostly concerned with demonization so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
-
this is, obviously, intolerable. so heavy-duty coping strategies are enacted down to the neurological level to fix this situation. these vary a lot in detail because any solution that gets the fishhook out of their brain is good enough and there isn't exactly a requirements doc
Show this thread -
but dissociation by neural inhibition is the theme. some people stop experiencing any of their emotions. some people stop experiencing a subset of emotions. most's intervention comes at some level prior to the mirror neurons, so they stay shockingly good at reading people
Show this thread -
for obvious reasons, control of social situations tends to become an area of major concern. you sometimes get what i think of as the "internal Omelas" effect, where some emotive core is locked away from being experienced but still produces a feverish degree of mental energy
Show this thread -
once you've enacted synapse-pruned neural roadblocks to keep other people's emotional states from yanking you around, of course, you might find that you care about other people's emotional states rather less than they think you should. and they might demonize you for it. oops
Show this thread -
but that's the guts of my working model. i hope you liked it and that it induces you to consider that perhaps our psychopath friends are people operating the way they do because it solves real and serious problems for them, not monsters who were just born bad!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
i would definitely not say i’m sure

- 15 more replies
-
-
-
this is cool but if we grant some people have very strong mirror neurons like in this theory, implies some have v weak ones relatively - couldnt they just be the psychos?
-
maybe? but it has poor explanatory power for the frequency of coincidence of high-outlier people reading skills but also perfectly likely more than one underlying mechanism gets to a similar place, which is why i was careful to say "main way"
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
theres an autism theory like this too. "intense world", i think
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.