I didn't say the guy in the hat deserved anything. I said wearing the hat is a deliberate racist provocation. Wearing a swastika is different than wearing any sort of clothing. The hat is a political statement and a threat. Pretty sure you're aware of that.https://twitter.com/James_Hiler/status/1088289789756010497 …
-
-
Replying to @nberlat
jesus noah, this is fucked 1. i and my friends have decided this entire political alignment is about racism 2. therefore when *you* display affiliation with this political alignment *you* mean it as a racist provocation the fuck happened to you
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @nberlat
Why do the theoretical provocateurs get to decide what is or isn’t a racist provocation? Surely what matters is whether it’s received as one by the provoked. Given the amount of racist bile Trump’s spewed, at best the MAGA hat conveys an indifference to/comfort with racism.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FirstClassHack @nberlat
right. my feelings about what you do are what determines your motivations for what you do. incidentally, please tone down your unbridled admiration of me as displayed by your use of the word "theoretical", i'm very humble and it's making me uncomfortable
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You’re pretty bad at this. Trump is racist. Maga is his slogan. It is a racist slogan. Wearing a racist slogan makes a reasonable case for you being racist absent other context. Your argument has no reasoning to it. If you don’t agree Trump is racist then you aren’t in good faith
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
well, you've certainly given me food for thought on the topic of reasoning
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.